Is lurking in the second wave isn't even in the slightest worsening those odds to the point anyone The disadvantage of not knowing the result of the first battle and not knowing what In other wordsįor each and every victorious battle only an risk of 4% that the hostile units gain a slight military bonusīecause they're not facing off any real resistance in battle in GbG, their odds to win any battle isĮxtremely high. This does reduce their risk to at worse 4% risk for attrition. It's not hard to construct sufficient SC in GbGīy the ''pro'' GbG players.
If it wasn't for cheats and in the vacuum of an perfect world with honest people, then this idea would'veīeen fantastic to make everything more efficient but unfortunately it's not and that causes it to be That isīesides being extremely vulnerable for exploitation the greatest fundamental flaw in this idea/suggestion. It is extremely naive and massively bold bet to gamble on that most of the time supercharged player'sĪrmies will lose their regular units, while the battle AI of the npc's are attacking first rouges. Out 1 action of the script for automation. As you'veīeen pointing out as an software expert and genius it shouldn't be hard to understand that taking For cheaters this does mean in their scripts 1 less action. Thus when this idea/suggestion is implemented, itĮnables everyone to do so. Healthy player's army in battle1 will lose their 2-3 regular units? While they're slaughtering easilyĬurrently auto-clickers can already enable cheaters to ''skip'' the results overview of the firstīattle. So, what do you feel like in this scenario that the odds are that an perfectly Most likely result: Player's armies win with barely any damage the first and second wave. NPC's armies damage: 1-1 / attack (if they even get the chance, not taking keen eye into account) Player's armies damage: 6-10 / attack (not taking even AO & keen eye into account)
Player's armies: striking the first hostile units they can harm Current situation:īattle 1 + battle 2 - final result victory or defeat
0 kommentar(er)
